Editorial Process

The Journal of Applied Scientific and Natural Studies (JASNS), published by Scholar Club Pvt Ltd, follows a structured, transparent, and ethical editorial process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original research in natural and applied sciences.

1. Submission and Initial Evaluation

Scope and Relevance

  • Manuscripts must present original research, critical reviews, or theoretical contributions aligned with the journal’s aims and scope, including natural sciences, environmental studies, applied sciences, and interdisciplinary research.
  • Authors are encouraged to consult the Aims & Scope before submission.

Plagiarism Screening

  • All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin).
  • The journal enforces a 19% similarity threshold to maintain academic integrity. Manuscripts exceeding this limit may be returned or rejected.

Manuscript Formatting

  • Manuscripts must follow the Author Guidelines.
  • Required elements: Title, author(s), affiliations, abstract, keywords, main text (IMRAD or relevant structure), references (APA style), tables, figures, and ethical declarations.

2. Peer Review Policy

Double-Blind Review

  • Both authors’ and reviewers’ identities remain confidential.
  • Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts.

Reviewer Selection & Ethics

  • Reviewers are chosen for subject expertise, research experience, and lack of conflicts of interest.
  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and avoid using unpublished data for personal gain.

Timelines

  • Reviewers are requested to submit feedback within 2–4 weeks.
  • The editorial team monitors progress and ensures timely communication with authors.

3. Editorial Decision-Making

Possible Outcomes

  • ✅ Accept
  • ✏️ Minor Revisions
  • Major Revisions
  • ❌ Reject

Revisions and Resubmissions

  • Authors must address reviewer comments clearly and resubmit within the given timeline.
  • In some cases, revised manuscripts may undergo a second round of peer review.

Appeals

  • Authors may appeal decisions with a written justification. Appeals are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and/or an independent board member.

4. Ethical Standards and Responsibilities

Authorship Criteria

  • All listed authors must have made significant contributions.
  • The corresponding author ensures all co-authors approve the submission.

Conflict of Interest

  • Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial, professional, or personal conflicts that could influence the editorial process.

Research Ethics

  • Studies involving humans, animals, or sensitive data must include ethical approval and informed consent statements.

5. Post-Publication Policies

Corrections and Retractions

  • Minor errors may result in a Correction (Erratum or Corrigendum).
  • Serious ethical violations or flawed research may lead to Retraction, with full transparency and indexing.

Archiving and Preservation

  • All published content is permanently archived to ensure long-term access and citation continuity.

6. Editorial Board Responsibilities

Selection and Diversity

  • Members are selected based on expertise, research credentials, and commitment to ethical publishing.

Duties

  • Peer review, quality assurance, and policy development.

Rotation and Renewal

  • Board composition is periodically updated to maintain relevance and diversity.

7. Communication and Transparency

Support for Authors

  • The editorial office assists with submission status, revisions, and journal policies.

Professional Conduct

  • All interactions among authors, editors, and reviewers must be respectful, timely, and collaborative.

By adhering to these processes, JASNS ensures the publication of reliable, ethically sound, and impactful research that advances knowledge in natural and applied sciences.