Authors' Appeals Policy

Purpose

The Lead Sci Journal of Management, Innovation and Social Sciences (LSJMISS) recognizes the right of authors to appeal editorial decisions when they believe a decision has been based on a misunderstanding, factual error, procedural irregularity, or perceived bias. The journal is committed to ensuring that all appeals are handled fairly, transparently, and impartially.

Grounds for Appeal

Authors may appeal editorial decisions when they believe that:

  • A significant misunderstanding of the manuscript has occurred;

  • Factual errors influenced the editorial decision;

  • Reviewer comments contain demonstrable errors or misunderstandings;

  • The review process was not conducted according to the journal's policies;

  • Evidence exists of potential bias or conflict of interest affecting the review process.

Appeals based solely on disagreement with reviewers' opinions are generally not sufficient grounds for reconsideration.

Appeal Procedure

Step 1: Submission of Appeal

Authors must submit a written appeal to the Editor-in-Chief within 30 days of receiving the editorial decision.

The appeal should include:

  • Manuscript title;

  • Manuscript identification number;

  • Date of decision;

  • Detailed explanation of the reasons for the appeal;

  • Point-by-point response addressing reviewer and editor comments;

  • Supporting evidence where applicable.

Appeals should be sent to the journal's official editorial email address.

Step 2: Initial Review of Appeal

The Editor-in-Chief will assess whether the appeal presents sufficient grounds for reconsideration.

The journal may:

  • Uphold the original decision;

  • Request additional information from the author;

  • Refer the manuscript for additional independent review.

Step 3: Independent Evaluation

Where appropriate, the journal may appoint an independent editor or additional reviewer(s) who were not involved in the original decision-making process.

The independent evaluator(s) will review the manuscript, reviewer reports, and appeal documentation before making recommendations.

Step 4: Final Decision

Following evaluation, the Editor-in-Chief will issue a final decision, which may include:

  • Acceptance of the appeal and reopening of the review process;

  • Invitation to revise and resubmit the manuscript;

  • Confirmation of the original decision.

The decision of the Editor-in-Chief following an appeal is final.

Confidentiality

All appeal proceedings will be treated confidentially. Information related to appeals will only be shared with individuals directly involved in the review and decision-making process.

Timeframe

LSJMISS aims to process appeals within 30–60 days, although complex cases may require additional time.

Complaints About Editorial Processes

Authors may also submit complaints regarding:

  • Editorial conduct;

  • Reviewer conduct;

  • Ethical concerns;

  • Conflicts of interest;

  • Delays in the review process.

Such complaints will be investigated by the Editor-in-Chief or an appropriately designated editorial representative.

Commitment to Fairness

LSJMISS is committed to handling all appeals and complaints objectively, transparently, and in accordance with internationally accepted standards of scholarly publishing and publication ethics.