The Techno-Digital Mirror and the Dispersed Identities: A Lacanian Analysis of Lisa Ko’s Memory Piece

Authors

  • Nawazish Rasool BS Student, Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Faisalabad
  • Maham Akram Lecturer/Coordinator, Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Faisalabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63056/jllsa.2.9.2026.331

Keywords:

Lacan, Lisa Ko, Memory Piece, externalised memory, digital capitalism, fragmented subjectivity

Abstract

The present research focused on the connection between techno-digital mediation, externalized memory and fragmented subjectivity in Lisa Ko's Memory Piece (2024) using the theoretical approach of Jacques Lacan's psychoanalysis. The research was conducted in a qualitative hermeneutic manner, in which digital archives, surveillance and algorithmic structures were examined in the way in which memory has become an externalized technological phenomenon. This study used the Lacanian concepts of the Mirror Stage, the Big Other, the Imaginary, the Symbolic, the Real, and repetition compulsion to discuss the experiences of the main characters of the novel. The results indicated that digital systems served as symbolic authorities which shaped identity, memory and emotional experience in the context of digital capitalism. The analysis also revealed an increased fragmentation of subjectivity, emotional alienation and repetitive uses of digital technology. In addition, the study revealed the way surveillance capitalism made memory, desire and human interaction into commodities of the algorithmic control and extraction. The findings indicate that Memory Piece provided a much needed literary portrayal of the psychological effects of digital capitalism and also the potential for resistance through the bodily, human relationship and collective solidarity.

Downloads

Published

06-09-2026

How to Cite

Rasool, N., & Akram, M. (2026). The Techno-Digital Mirror and the Dispersed Identities: A Lacanian Analysis of Lisa Ko’s Memory Piece. Journal of Language, Literature & Social Affairs , 2(9), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.63056/jllsa.2.9.2026.331