Reviewer Guidelines

We thank you for your valuable contribution as a reviewer for the Journal of Language, Literature & Social Affairs (JLLSA). Your expertise plays a crucial role in maintaining the quality, fairness, and academic integrity of our publication. Please adhere to the following guidelines to ensure a thorough and ethical review process.

1. Confidentiality

  • The peer review process is strictly confidential. Do not share, discuss, or distribute the manuscript or your review with anyone outside the editorial team unless explicitly authorized by the editor.
  • Refrain from using, referencing, or incorporating any unpublished content from the manuscript into your own research until the work is officially published.

2. Conflict of Interest

  • If you have a personal, professional, or financial conflict of interest with the authors or the content of the manuscript, you must decline the review request.
  • If uncertain about a potential conflict, please consult the editorial office for guidance before proceeding.

3. Timeliness

  • Please complete and submit your review within the agreed timeframe (usually within 2–4 weeks). If you anticipate delays, promptly notify the editorial office to request an extension.
  • Timely reviews support an efficient editorial process and benefit both authors and the journal.

4. Scope and Relevance

  • Ensure the manuscript aligns with the aims and scope of JLLSA, which focuses on language, literature, and the social sciences.
  • Comment on the manuscript's relevance, originality, and potential contribution to the field.

5. Review Structure

Your review should be clear, objective, and structured in the following format:

a. Summary of the Manuscript

  • Provide a concise overview of the paper, including the research question, methodology, and main conclusions. This helps the authors verify whether their key points are communicated effectively.

b. Major Comments

  • Research Design: Assess whether the methodology is appropriate and aligned with the research objectives.
  • Data and Analysis: Evaluate the quality, reliability, and sufficiency of the data and the rigor of the analysis.
  • Findings and Conclusions: Consider whether the conclusions are supported by the evidence presented.
  • Originality and Contribution: Comment on the novelty and significance of the research within its field.

c. Minor Comments

  • Suggest improvements related to clarity, organization, style, or formatting.
  • Point out any inconsistencies, ambiguous sections, or areas that require further explanation.

d. Recommendation

Based on your evaluation, provide one of the following editorial recommendations:

  1. Accept as is
  2. Minor revisions
  3. Major revisions
  4. Reject

6. Quality of Writing

  • Assess the manuscript’s clarity, coherence, and readability. Provide constructive suggestions to improve its structure and presentation.
  • If the language is unclear or the manuscript is poorly written, recommend professional language editing.

7. Plagiarism and Ethical Concerns

  • JLLSA enforces a strict anti-plagiarism policy with a similarity threshold of 10%.
  • If you detect plagiarism, data manipulation, or any other ethical concerns, immediately notify the editorial team with specific details.

8. Anonymity and Double-Blind Review

  • JLLSA follows a double-blind peer review Neither the reviewers nor the authors should be aware of each other’s identities.
  • Do not include your name, affiliation, or any self-identifying comments in your review.

9. Constructive and Respectful Feedback

  • Your feedback should be clear, detailed, and constructive, aimed at helping authors improve their manuscript.
  • Maintain a professional, respectful tone. Avoid harsh, judgmental, or dismissive language.

10. Re-Review of Revised Manuscripts

  • If major revisions are requested, you may be asked to review the revised version of the manuscript.
  • When re-reviewing, assess whether the authors have adequately addressed your original comments and suggestions.

By adhering to these guidelines, you help ensure the continued quality and integrity of research published in JLLSA. We appreciate your dedication to academic excellence and thank you for your service to the scholarly community.